![]() On balance I came away from the discussion with the impression that the differences in functionality are of minor importance for most people most of the time that those who spoke against OpenOffice generally did so on the basis of mis-information and, that most of the arguments for Microsoft Office were in one way or another artifacts of market share rather than technology with people using Office where they shouldn't simply because they have it, or because other people have it. And desktop databases.I'll stop before I get started. Maybe I can see it for very small companies but good grief. It seems to me a lot of these features that people love about Word shouldn't be in Word or any other word processor. When I find something like this going on in an organization I immediately suggest a more robust application suited to this purpose. If you want a dictionary build a database and web app. I would not trust this type of work or programming to some single file that sitting out on a share probably. When I start reading about some of the complex things people do with word processors I cringe. Usage creep is another issue along the same lines: people who've successfully abused Microsoft Office demanding comparable usage "benefits" from OpenOffice - an issue nailed by Storm14k in this comment with respect to the word processor component: This is a real issue people are afraid of - one you'll hear cited when you suggest people convert their own operations to OpenOffice, but which actually reflects bugs in Microsoft Office and offers the ironic implication that OpenOffice ought to code for those bugs. Lance.e.king, for example, pointed out that work done in Impress doesn't always survive a transition to PowerPoint, while other people mentioned similar problems, particularly with respect to embedded imagery, with Writer to Word translations. The only obviously unanswerable criticism of OO came from people concerned with inter-operability issues with respect to conversions from OO to Microsoft Office. OpenOffice is better for most users because it's free, but it's reasonable to assume that a few users will want/need/demand Microsoft Office for functional or personal reasons.People who preferred OpenOffice generally argued one of two positions:.People who wrote against Openoffice usually did so in demonstrable error - on the original mail merge issue, on performance, and on specific functions, most of which OO simply doesn't handle in the same way Microsoft Office does.argued without contradiction that the Access front end is much better than its competitor.argued it's use as a smart client in more complex applications or,.argued for the Microsoft suite on the grounds that other people's use of it forced them to adopt it.people who preferred Microsoft Office to OpenOffice generally also did one or more of the following:. ![]() ![]() As of this June 8th this had drawn 142 comments from which I concluded that: Dropped indicates that while the office suite works, new versions are no longer being released for the indicated OS the number in parentheses is the last known stable version which was officially released for that OS.Last week I asked for help understanding the circumstances under which one of these packages is distinctly preferable to the other.Yes indicates that the office suite has been officially released in a fully functional, stable version. PCWorld 10:45 am PDT Image: Rob Schultz When it comes to office productivity suites, there is little doubt that Microsoft Office dominates. ![]() Beta indicates that while a version of the office suite is fully functional and has been released, it is still in development (e.g.Partial indicates that while the office suite works, it lacks important functionality compared to versions for other OSs it is still being developed however.No indicates that it does not exist or was never released. Microsoft Office remains the most popular productivity suite for documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and more - whether as a download software package, or as the cloud-based Microsoft 365.The operating systems the office suites were designed to run on without emulation for the given office suite/OS combination, there are five possibilities: ![]() No cost, optional subscriptions with support available Office Suite names that are on a light purple background are discontinued. The following tables compare general and technical information for a number of office suites: ( August 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Please help improve this article if you can. The specific problem is: wikidata references are not displaying properly. This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |